W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org > March 2015

Re: xsd:anyURI syntax

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 14:13:27 -0700
Message-ID: <550C8D77.4010209@gmail.com>
To: Arthur Ryman <arthur.ryman@gmail.com>
CC: "public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org" <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

My view is that SHACL is indeed different from OWL and RDFS in this way.
Whether that difference is enough to necessitate a quoting mechanism when
using identifiers is a separate, but related, question.

peter


On 03/20/2015 02:06 PM, Arthur Ryman wrote:
> Peter,
> 
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 12:10 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider 
> <pfpschneider@gmail.com> wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
>> 
>> The benefit is representational cleanliness.  The literals of type 
>> xsd:anyURI are being turned into bits of SPARQL code, which are
>> character strings that are of the form of IRIs.
> 
> Do you think that the use of IRIs in SHACL is conceptually different than
> the use of IRIs in RDFS or OWL? If so, how? If SHACL uses IRIs in a way
> similar to the way RDFS and OWL do , then we shouldn't use ^^xsd:anyURI.
> 
> -- Arthur
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVDI13AAoJECjN6+QThfjzJl8IAJeb3c93Ai6ZtcG8fRwwz3kX
MqZovzl1t2d4NFCI5LO7JzhXN2CTWSL2up2KUQEmVMCXLcQqrOGVBOBhKkDX2Z3l
sULwBMWOJR0ieQi/CcR34V5s3/O0IRdGdM/WGccZnW+NLJCbJp8mwbMjIfm0xxkY
lb0g5o3NAUO02/gsxbmXrgTTmpw05Xszi7V5R2MNg3P+ptqw6XVW7jyh85i4J+Xi
4WAQTR4goUShoq7X8Axauy6f7aLZaph8+g2tVAhYVZBhvq+JUa5MuSdhd+gWatI5
JSqLsoLoOB9ZM+p/I9f7evTTdB7VEOEPXtrLBz48X73XOyB+Ba4/FMARt+RJnd0=
=ef2h
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Friday, 20 March 2015 21:13:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:30:18 UTC