Re: June 18 call summary: resolved to publish use-cases-and-requirements

On 20 Jun 2014, at 13:51 , Tandy, Jeremy <jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk> wrote:

> Hi Dan & Ivan -
> 
> Thanks for your help.
> 
> Pending resolution of the [request sent to Ivan this morning][1] I have managed to run through the entire publishing process to generate the [`Overview`][2] and [`diff`][3] html pages via RawGit.
> 
> Regarding the [PubRules][4] validation (see [results][5])...
> - I fixed some nested anchor elements caused by using `<a>` within a figure caption that then got wrapped in another `<a>` by respec, and found a pair of unescaped `<` and `>` characters ... nothing much.
> - HTML validation still complains (with a warning) that the <bdi> element is not generally supported

That is warning. We should get that through with the webmaster:-)

> - I get an error on the boiler plate regarding the Patent Policy ... even though this is generated by respect :-(

Hm. I will have to look at that next week, I vaguely remember some issues with the checker

> - I get a number of HTTP 404 errors on URLs in the document; but these are all from with <pre> elements (e.g. literal examples) and we agreed last time that these didn't count

Yes. We will have to document that to the webmaster

> - I get an HTTP 403 error on http://www.nhs.uk/aboutnhschoices/contactus/pages/freedom-of-information.aspx - but this resolves fine for me in my browser!
> 

Yes, there are sites that put in obstacles for robots. As long as this is documented that it works...


> Once we're happy that the UCR document is in its final state, I'll run though this process again ... it didn't take very long.

But we should merge it to the main branch, and not keep it in the separate one. The whole purpose is that whatever changes you do should be there once and for all and you would not have to repeat them next time:-)

> 
> Also, I'd appreciate an experienced assessment on the things that PubRules says I need to manually verify. Most of them seem OK - but what do I know!?
> 

I will do that next week.

Ivan

> Best Regards, Jeremy
> 
> PS. I've added a few amendments to the [publishing process][6] to explain how to use the RawGit service.

Thanks! We and others will, hopefully profit from it...

I can contact the webmaster with an agreement for the 1st of July, but I have to know whether the UCR is the only document to be published on that day!


Ivan

> 
> [1]: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-csv-wg/2014Jun/0131.html
> [2]: https://rawgit.com/w3c/csvw/pwd-ucr/publishing-snapshots/WD-ucr-2014-07-01/Overview.html 
> [3]: https://rawgit.com/w3c/csvw/pwd-ucr/publishing-snapshots/WD-ucr-2014-07-01/diff-20140327.html 
> [4]: http://www.w3.org/2005/07/pubrules 
> [5]: http://services.w3.org/xslt?xmlfile=http%3A%2F%2Fservices.w3.org%2Ftidy%2Ftidy%3FdocAddr%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Frawgit.com%252Fw3c%252Fcsvw%252Fpwd-ucr%252Fpublishing-snapshots%252FWD-ucr-2014-07-01%252FOverview.html&xslfile=http%3A%2F%2Fservices.w3.org%2Fxslt%3Fxmlfile%3Dhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2005%2F07%2Fpubrules%253Fuimode%253Dchecker_full%2526year%253D2014%2526docstatus%253Dord-wd-tr%2526rectrack%253Dyes%2526prevrec%253Dnone%2526patpol%253Dw3c%2526normative%253Dyes%2526uri%253Dhttps%25253A%25252F%25252Frawgit.com%25252Fw3c%25252Fcsvw%25252Fpwd-ucr%25252Fpublishing-snapshots%25252FWD-ucr-2014-07-01%25252FOverview.html%2526filterValues%253D%2526nscheckmanual%253D%2526display%253Dall%2526recursive%253Doff%2526recurse_auth%253Don%26xslfile%3Dhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2005%2F09%2Fchecker%2Fframe.xsl%26display%3Dall%26recurse_auth%3Don&uimode=checker_full&filterValues=&year=2014&docstatus=ord-wd-tr&rectrack=yes&prevrec=none&patpol=w3c&normative=yes&doc_uri=https%3A%2F%2Frawgit.com%2Fw3c%2Fcsvw%2Fpwd-ucr%2Fpublishing-snapshots%2FWD-ucr-2014-07-01%2FOverview.html&recursive=off&nscheckmanual=&display=all&recurse_auth=on 
> [6]: https://github.com/w3c/csvw/blob/gh-pages/publishing_process.md 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Dan Brickley [mailto:danbri@google.com]
>> Sent: 19 June 2014 19:58
>> To: Tandy, Jeremy
>> Cc: Ivan Herman; Jeni Tennison; Eric Stephan; Davide Ceolin; W3C CSV on
>> the Web Working Group
>> Subject: Re: June 18 call summary: resolved to publish use-cases-and-
>> requirements
>> 
>> On 19 June 2014 16:02, Tandy, Jeremy <jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk>
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Ivan -
>>> 
>>> I've created the new ucr WD on a new branch: pwd-ucr ... because I
>> didn't want to confuse things by publishing early wrt the W3C
>> publishing regime.
>>> 
>>> I've got up to step 4.vii of the [publishing process][1] but because
>> I am not on gh-pages branch I can't push my new Overview.html to a
>> publically accessible web server in order to run the W3C pub rules
>> checker.
>> 
>> There's a service at rawgit.com that seems useful, for short-term low
>> traffic use. I pasted https://github.com/w3c/csvw/blob/gh-pages/use-
>> cases-and-requirements/index.html
>> into their "development" form and get:
>> 
>> https://rawgit.com/w3c/csvw/gh-pages/use-cases-and-
>> requirements/index.html
>> 
>> I tried that in pubrules checker http://www.w3.org/2005/07/pubrules and
>> got:
>> 
>> Using org.apache.xerces.parsers.SAXParser
>> Exception net.sf.saxon.trans.XPathException:
>> org.xml.sax.SAXParseException; systemId:
>> http://services.w3.org/tidy/tidy?docAddr=https%3A%2F%2Frawgit.com%2Fw3c
>> %2Fcsvw%2Fgh-pages%2Fuse-cases-and-requirements%2Findex.html;
>> lineNumber: 11; columnNumber: 149; An invalid XML character (Unicode:
>> 0x1b) was found in the element content of the document.
>> org.xml.sax.SAXParseException; systemId:
>> http://services.w3.org/tidy/tidy?docAddr=https%3A%2F%2Frawgit.com%2Fw3c
>> %2Fcsvw%2Fgh-pages%2Fuse-cases-and-requirements%2Findex.html;
>> lineNumber: 11; columnNumber: 149; An invalid XML character (Unicode:
>> 0x1b) was found in the element content of the document.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> Would you just recommend that I merge in the changes with gh-pages
>> branch and get on with the process?
>>> 
>>> Many thanks, Jeremy
>>> 
>>> [1]: https://github.com/w3c/csvw/blob/gh-pages/publishing_process.md
>>> 
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Ivan Herman [mailto:ivan@w3.org]
>>>> Sent: 19 June 2014 11:37
>>>> To: Tandy, Jeremy; Jeni Tennison
>>>> Cc: Eric Stephan; Davide Ceolin; W3C CSV on the Web Working Group;
>>>> Dan Brickley
>>>> Subject: Re: June 18 call summary: resolved to publish use-cases-
>> and-
>>>> requirements
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 19 Jun 2014, at 10:23 , Tandy, Jeremy
>>>> <jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Ivan: """Tuesday 1st of July is our best option"""
>>>>> 
>>>>> I'm happy with this for next PWD release.
>>>> 
>>>> Would this be also a date for publishing the two other (model,
>>>> metadata) documents, or do we want to do an independent publishing?
>>>> (Both are fine with me, but we should decide).
>>>> 
>>>> Jeremy, can you try to go through the publishing process, as
>>>> described in the archive? I hope that would work...
>>>> 
>>>> Ivan
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Jeremy
>>>>> 
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: Ivan Herman [mailto:ivan@w3.org]
>>>>>> Sent: 18 June 2014 17:13
>>>>>> To: Eric Stephan; Davide Ceolin; Tandy, Jeremy
>>>>>> Cc: W3C CSV on the Web Working Group; Dan Brickley
>>>>>> Subject: Re: June 18 call summary: resolved to publish use-cases-
>>>> and-
>>>>>> requirements
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 18 Jun 2014, at 15:33 , Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> <skip/>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Next steps: UCR editors, can you wrap up any outstanding tweaks,
>>>> and
>>>>>>> liaise with Ivan to get a publication date scheduled? (please
>>>>>>> copy
>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> list on these details)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Publishing happens on tuesdays and thursdays. It always require
>>>>>> some preparation and also an agreement with the webmaster (to put
>>>>>> this into his schedule). Note also what I wrote down after the
>>>>>> previous
>>>> round:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> https://github.com/w3c/csvw/blob/gh-pages/publishing_process.md
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> which helps in speeding things up.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> As far as my schedule is concerned, I am free next week Tuesday
>>>>>> (24th), but I am not really available for the rest of this week
>> (I
>>>> am
>>>>>> currently in Oslo for a conference, traveling back on Friday), so
>>>>>> this may be tight. I am not available on the 26th. I am available
>>>>>> on the first two weeks of July both on Tuesdays and Thursdays.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> My feeling is that the Tuesday 1st of July is our best option, at
>>>>>> least from my side (ie, if you can finalize the documents by
>> then)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Would that work?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Would we also want to schedule the two other documents for that
>>>>>> date (model and metadata)? Note that we need an explicit WG
>>>>>> resolution
>>>> and
>>>>>> a request for an official 'short name' for the latter, because
>>>>>> that is a first public draft. (In case you wonder: all this admin
>>>>>> around the first draft is mainly necessary for the management of
>>>>>> Patent
>>>> Policies.
>>>>>> The world would be simpler if we did not have to deal with
>>>>>> that...)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Ivan
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> chairs,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Dan
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> ----
>>>>>> Ivan Herman, W3C
>>>>>> Digital Publishing Activity Lead
>>>>>> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
>>>>>> mobile: +31-641044153
>>>>>> GPG: 0x343F1A3D
>>>>>> WebID: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf#me
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ----
>>>> Ivan Herman, W3C
>>>> Digital Publishing Activity Lead
>>>> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
>>>> mobile: +31-641044153
>>>> GPG: 0x343F1A3D
>>>> WebID: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf#me
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 


----
Ivan Herman, W3C 
Digital Publishing Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
GPG: 0x343F1A3D
WebID: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf#me