- From: Tandy, Jeremy <jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 15:11:02 +0000
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- CC: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>, Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>, Eric Stephan <ericphb@gmail.com>, Davide Ceolin <d.ceolin@vu.nl>, "W3C CSV on the Web Working Group" <public-csv-wg@w3.org>
Ivan - thanks for initial comment. We'll merge pwd-ucr into gh-pages once we're happy. Until then, I fix `index.html` in gh-pages branch and then generate a new `Overview.html` (from respec) which I commit into pwd-ucr. Jeremy > -----Original Message----- > From: Ivan Herman [mailto:ivan@w3.org] > Sent: 20 June 2014 15:40 > To: Tandy, Jeremy > Cc: Dan Brickley; Jeni Tennison; Eric Stephan; Davide Ceolin; W3C CSV > on the Web Working Group > Subject: Re: June 18 call summary: resolved to publish use-cases-and- > requirements > > > On 20 Jun 2014, at 13:51 , Tandy, Jeremy > <jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk> wrote: > > > Hi Dan & Ivan - > > > > Thanks for your help. > > > > Pending resolution of the [request sent to Ivan this morning][1] I > have managed to run through the entire publishing process to generate > the [`Overview`][2] and [`diff`][3] html pages via RawGit. > > > > Regarding the [PubRules][4] validation (see [results][5])... > > - I fixed some nested anchor elements caused by using `<a>` within a > figure caption that then got wrapped in another `<a>` by respec, and > found a pair of unescaped `<` and `>` characters ... nothing much. > > - HTML validation still complains (with a warning) that the <bdi> > > element is not generally supported > > That is warning. We should get that through with the webmaster:-) > > > - I get an error on the boiler plate regarding the Patent Policy ... > > even though this is generated by respect :-( > > Hm. I will have to look at that next week, I vaguely remember some > issues with the checker > > > - I get a number of HTTP 404 errors on URLs in the document; but > these > > are all from with <pre> elements (e.g. literal examples) and we > agreed > > last time that these didn't count > > Yes. We will have to document that to the webmaster > > > - I get an HTTP 403 error on > http://www.nhs.uk/aboutnhschoices/contactus/pages/freedom-of- > information.aspx - but this resolves fine for me in my browser! > > > > Yes, there are sites that put in obstacles for robots. As long as this > is documented that it works... > > > > Once we're happy that the UCR document is in its final state, I'll > run though this process again ... it didn't take very long. > > But we should merge it to the main branch, and not keep it in the > separate one. The whole purpose is that whatever changes you do should > be there once and for all and you would not have to repeat them next > time:-) > > > > > Also, I'd appreciate an experienced assessment on the things that > PubRules says I need to manually verify. Most of them seem OK - but > what do I know!? > > > > I will do that next week. > > Ivan > > > Best Regards, Jeremy > > > > PS. I've added a few amendments to the [publishing process][6] to > explain how to use the RawGit service. > > Thanks! We and others will, hopefully profit from it... > > I can contact the webmaster with an agreement for the 1st of July, but > I have to know whether the UCR is the only document to be published on > that day! > > > Ivan > > > > > [1]: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-csv-wg/2014Jun/0131.html > > [2]: > > https://rawgit.com/w3c/csvw/pwd-ucr/publishing-snapshots/WD-ucr-2014- > 0 > > 7-01/Overview.html > > [3]: > > https://rawgit.com/w3c/csvw/pwd-ucr/publishing-snapshots/WD-ucr-2014- > 0 > > 7-01/diff-20140327.html > > [4]: http://www.w3.org/2005/07/pubrules > > [5]: > > > http://services.w3.org/xslt?xmlfile=http%3A%2F%2Fservices.w3.org%2Ftid > > > y%2Ftidy%3FdocAddr%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Frawgit.com%252Fw3c%252Fcsvw%2 > > 52Fpwd-ucr%252Fpublishing-snapshots%252FWD-ucr-2014-07- > 01%252FOverview > > > .html&xslfile=http%3A%2F%2Fservices.w3.org%2Fxslt%3Fxmlfile%3Dhttp%3A% > > > 2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2005%2F07%2Fpubrules%253Fuimode%253Dchecker_full%252 > > 6year%253D2014%2526docstatus%253Dord-wd- > tr%2526rectrack%253Dyes%2526pr > > > evrec%253Dnone%2526patpol%253Dw3c%2526normative%253Dyes%2526uri%253Dht > > tps%25253A%25252F%25252Frawgit.com%25252Fw3c%25252Fcsvw%25252Fpwd- > ucr% > > 25252Fpublishing-snapshots%25252FWD-ucr-2014-07- > 01%25252FOverview.html > > > %2526filterValues%253D%2526nscheckmanual%253D%2526display%253Dall%2526 > > > recursive%253Doff%2526recurse_auth%253Don%26xslfile%3Dhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww > > > .w3.org%2F2005%2F09%2Fchecker%2Fframe.xsl%26display%3Dall%26recurse_au > > th%3Don&uimode=checker_full&filterValues=&year=2014&docstatus=ord-wd- > t > > > r&rectrack=yes&prevrec=none&patpol=w3c&normative=yes&doc_uri=https%3A% > > 2F%2Frawgit.com%2Fw3c%2Fcsvw%2Fpwd-ucr%2Fpublishing-snapshots%2FWD- > ucr > > -2014-07- > 01%2FOverview.html&recursive=off&nscheckmanual=&display=all&r > > ecurse_auth=on > > [6]: https://github.com/w3c/csvw/blob/gh-pages/publishing_process.md > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Dan Brickley [mailto:danbri@google.com] > >> Sent: 19 June 2014 19:58 > >> To: Tandy, Jeremy > >> Cc: Ivan Herman; Jeni Tennison; Eric Stephan; Davide Ceolin; W3C CSV > >> on the Web Working Group > >> Subject: Re: June 18 call summary: resolved to publish use-cases- > and- > >> requirements > >> > >> On 19 June 2014 16:02, Tandy, Jeremy <jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk> > >> wrote: > >>> Hi Ivan - > >>> > >>> I've created the new ucr WD on a new branch: pwd-ucr ... because I > >> didn't want to confuse things by publishing early wrt the W3C > >> publishing regime. > >>> > >>> I've got up to step 4.vii of the [publishing process][1] but > because > >> I am not on gh-pages branch I can't push my new Overview.html to a > >> publically accessible web server in order to run the W3C pub rules > >> checker. > >> > >> There's a service at rawgit.com that seems useful, for short-term > low > >> traffic use. I pasted https://github.com/w3c/csvw/blob/gh-pages/use- > >> cases-and-requirements/index.html > >> into their "development" form and get: > >> > >> https://rawgit.com/w3c/csvw/gh-pages/use-cases-and- > >> requirements/index.html > >> > >> I tried that in pubrules checker http://www.w3.org/2005/07/pubrules > >> and > >> got: > >> > >> Using org.apache.xerces.parsers.SAXParser > >> Exception net.sf.saxon.trans.XPathException: > >> org.xml.sax.SAXParseException; systemId: > >> > http://services.w3.org/tidy/tidy?docAddr=https%3A%2F%2Frawgit.com%2Fw > >> 3c %2Fcsvw%2Fgh-pages%2Fuse-cases-and-requirements%2Findex.html; > >> lineNumber: 11; columnNumber: 149; An invalid XML character > (Unicode: > >> 0x1b) was found in the element content of the document. > >> org.xml.sax.SAXParseException; systemId: > >> > http://services.w3.org/tidy/tidy?docAddr=https%3A%2F%2Frawgit.com%2Fw > >> 3c %2Fcsvw%2Fgh-pages%2Fuse-cases-and-requirements%2Findex.html; > >> lineNumber: 11; columnNumber: 149; An invalid XML character > (Unicode: > >> 0x1b) was found in the element content of the document. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>> Would you just recommend that I merge in the changes with gh-pages > >> branch and get on with the process? > >>> > >>> Many thanks, Jeremy > >>> > >>> [1]: https://github.com/w3c/csvw/blob/gh- > pages/publishing_process.md > >>> > >>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>> From: Ivan Herman [mailto:ivan@w3.org] > >>>> Sent: 19 June 2014 11:37 > >>>> To: Tandy, Jeremy; Jeni Tennison > >>>> Cc: Eric Stephan; Davide Ceolin; W3C CSV on the Web Working Group; > >>>> Dan Brickley > >>>> Subject: Re: June 18 call summary: resolved to publish use-cases- > >> and- > >>>> requirements > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On 19 Jun 2014, at 10:23 , Tandy, Jeremy > >>>> <jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Ivan: """Tuesday 1st of July is our best option""" > >>>>> > >>>>> I'm happy with this for next PWD release. > >>>> > >>>> Would this be also a date for publishing the two other (model, > >>>> metadata) documents, or do we want to do an independent > publishing? > >>>> (Both are fine with me, but we should decide). > >>>> > >>>> Jeremy, can you try to go through the publishing process, as > >>>> described in the archive? I hope that would work... > >>>> > >>>> Ivan > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Jeremy > >>>>> > >>>>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>>>> From: Ivan Herman [mailto:ivan@w3.org] > >>>>>> Sent: 18 June 2014 17:13 > >>>>>> To: Eric Stephan; Davide Ceolin; Tandy, Jeremy > >>>>>> Cc: W3C CSV on the Web Working Group; Dan Brickley > >>>>>> Subject: Re: June 18 call summary: resolved to publish use- > cases- > >>>> and- > >>>>>> requirements > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On 18 Jun 2014, at 15:33 , Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> > >> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> <skip/> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Next steps: UCR editors, can you wrap up any outstanding > tweaks, > >>>> and > >>>>>>> liaise with Ivan to get a publication date scheduled? (please > >>>>>>> copy > >>>>>> the > >>>>>>> list on these details) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Publishing happens on tuesdays and thursdays. It always require > >>>>>> some preparation and also an agreement with the webmaster (to > put > >>>>>> this into his schedule). Note also what I wrote down after the > >>>>>> previous > >>>> round: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> https://github.com/w3c/csvw/blob/gh-pages/publishing_process.md > >>>>>> > >>>>>> which helps in speeding things up. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> As far as my schedule is concerned, I am free next week Tuesday > >>>>>> (24th), but I am not really available for the rest of this week > >> (I > >>>> am > >>>>>> currently in Oslo for a conference, traveling back on Friday), > so > >>>>>> this may be tight. I am not available on the 26th. I am > available > >>>>>> on the first two weeks of July both on Tuesdays and Thursdays. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> My feeling is that the Tuesday 1st of July is our best option, > at > >>>>>> least from my side (ie, if you can finalize the documents by > >> then) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Would that work? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Would we also want to schedule the two other documents for that > >>>>>> date (model and metadata)? Note that we need an explicit WG > >>>>>> resolution > >>>> and > >>>>>> a request for an official 'short name' for the latter, because > >>>>>> that is a first public draft. (In case you wonder: all this > admin > >>>>>> around the first draft is mainly necessary for the management of > >>>>>> Patent > >>>> Policies. > >>>>>> The world would be simpler if we did not have to deal with > >>>>>> that...) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Cheers > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Ivan > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> chairs, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Dan > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> ---- > >>>>>> Ivan Herman, W3C > >>>>>> Digital Publishing Activity Lead > >>>>>> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ > >>>>>> mobile: +31-641044153 > >>>>>> GPG: 0x343F1A3D > >>>>>> WebID: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf#me > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> ---- > >>>> Ivan Herman, W3C > >>>> Digital Publishing Activity Lead > >>>> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ > >>>> mobile: +31-641044153 > >>>> GPG: 0x343F1A3D > >>>> WebID: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf#me > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > > > ---- > Ivan Herman, W3C > Digital Publishing Activity Lead > Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ > mobile: +31-641044153 > GPG: 0x343F1A3D > WebID: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf#me > > > >
Received on Friday, 20 June 2014 15:11:31 UTC