- From: Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
- Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 22:20:08 -0400
- To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Cc: Public CSS Test suite mailing list <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
Le 2017-04-12 19:56, Chris Lilley a écrit : > Gérard, > > Saying to Geoffrey "When will the documentation on GitHub be updated > and reliable? " is about as reasonable as my asking you "When will all > the CSS tests be updated and reliable?". It is a community effort, and > we all need to work together to improve things. I can not update the documentation on GitHub. My question was awkward and not ideal but it was a follow-up to this chunk: " (...) there's some not-great stuff at <http://testthewebforward.org/docs/configuration.html> that's currently being revised. GitHub have their own documentation at <https://help.github.com>, which is a bit disorganised, (...) " Documentation on submitting and modifying CSS tests with GitHub http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-css-testsuite/2017Jan/0022.html > Technically, it is better to point out specific problems with > documentation. Then there can be discussion, A discussion in a GitHub file issue? or in this mailing list? I have asked several times: what is the purpose of this mailing list? > and once there is > consensus on how to correct it, the documentation can be updated (by > whomever gets around to it first). I wish all the documentation files would be updated and reliable (as reliable as humanly possible): this should be a priority. Do we actually need to discuss this point of view? Gérard -- Writing Tests http://web-platform-tests.org/writing-tests/ General Test Guidelines http://web-platform-tests.org/writing-tests/general-guidelines.html Test Review Checklist http://web-platform-tests.org/reviewing-tests/checklist.html Test Templates http://web-platform-tests.org/appendix/test-templates.html Writing Reftests http://web-platform-tests.org/writing-tests/reftests.html
Received on Thursday, 13 April 2017 02:20:45 UTC