W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-testsuite@w3.org > March 2015

Re: [css3-ui] cursor image format tests

From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 13:52:01 +0100
Message-ID: <180949883.20150324135201@w3.org>
To: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>
CC: "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
Hello Florian,

Monday, March 23, 2015, 7:10:44 PM, you wrote:


>> On 23 Mar 2015, at 18:10, Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net> wrote:
>> 
>>> E) I have not yet written tests for hotspot position (apart from
>>> merely parsing the values in the CSS), but plan to.
>> 
>> That would be very useful, especially with regards to clamping.

> Also, this little sentence opens up for a bunch more tests (with "may" in the meta flags):

Before doing so, is there any data on current implementations which
actually implement that optional behaviour? (I know, the best way to
determine that would be from test results, which needs approved tests,
which needs ...)

> "Agents may, instead of <url>, support <image> which is a superset."

> - cursors with gradients
> - cursors with image-set()
> - cursors with cross-fade()
> - cursors with image()

> Of course, just because you've been nice enough to write a bunch of
> tests for cursor doesn't mean that you have to write all the
> remaining tests for cursor, but if you feel like doing more, that
> could be worth looking into.

:)

If no browsers currently support that, I would assign a low priority.

If one browser is supporting it, or has said that they are working on
it, then it would have a higher priority.

If two or more are, then the spec should up that to a "should".

-- 
Best regards,
 Chris Lilley, Technical Director, W3C Interaction Domain
Received on Tuesday, 24 March 2015 12:52:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 20 January 2023 19:58:21 UTC