- From: Shiozawa, Hajime <hajime.shiozawa@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2015 00:31:47 +0900
- To: Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
- Cc: Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gluesoft.co.jp>, Public CSS test suite mailing list <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAHSwuKMPm_JvO0TqdJuCbY+nAZmRq3WiAg=wLNwmLmCqSAd2MQ@mail.gmail.com>
Gérard, I've submitted the new reference files. https://hg.csswg.org/test/rev/219e6caa0a62 I have not adjusted inline-block-alignment-new-009.xht and inline-block-alignment-new-010.xht. And I have created the new reference file for these two test case. Is this right choice? Hajime. 2015-07-17 9:29 GMT+09:00 Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>: > Le 2015-07-15 19:58, 塩澤 元 a écrit : > >> Gérard, >> >> I have submitted. >> >> https://hg.csswg.org/test/rev/74cf2d8eb799 >> >> >> > Hajime, > > 5- >>> >>> >>> >>> http://test.csswg.org/source/css-writing-modes-3/inline-block-alignment-new-009.xht >>> >>> I believe inline-block-alignment-new-009.xht's reference file should be >>> >>> inline-block-alignment-new-007-ref.xht and not >>> inline-block-alignment-new-006-ref.xht >>> >>> and inline-block-alignment-new-009's pass-fail-conditions should be >>> >>> <p>Test passes if the <strong>right edge</strong> of an irregular polygon >>> is straight and unbroken.</p> >>> >>> and not left edge. >>> >>> >>> > Your > InlineBlockAlphabeticalAlignment.PNG > re-attached to this email confirms my opinion: > > inline-block-alignment-new-009.xht's reference file should be > inline-block-alignment-new-007-ref.xht > and not > inline-block-alignment-new-006-ref.xht > > Please adjust inline-block-alignment-new-009.xht accordingly. > > 6- >>> >>> >>> >>> http://test.csswg.org/source/css-writing-modes-3/inline-block-alignment-new-010.xht >>> >>> I believe inline-block-alignment-new-010.xht's reference file should be >>> >>> inline-block-alignment-new-006-ref.xht and not >>> inline-block-alignment-new-007-ref.xht >>> >>> and inline-block-alignment-new-010's pass-fail-conditions should be >>> >>> <p>Test passes if the <strong>left edge</strong> of an irregular polygon >>> is straight and unbroken.</p> >>> >>> and not right edge. >>> >> > > Your > InlineBlockAlphabeticalAlignment.PNG > re-attached to this email confirms my opinion: > > inline-block-alignment-new-010.xht's reference file should be > inline-block-alignment-new-006-ref.xht > and not > inline-block-alignment-new-007-ref.xht > > > Please adjust inline-block-alignment-new-010.xht accordingly. > > > Now I have another thought. Now I think that the reference files must have >> four pattern for alphabetical baseline testcase. >> >> - (1) vertical-rl + sideways-right (= vertical-rl + sideways) >> - (2) vertical-rl + sideways-left >> - (3) vertical-lr + sideways-right >> - (4) veritcal-lr + sideways-left (= vertical-lr + sideways) >> >> I've attached the image which represents above all pattern. >> In the image, "ABCDEFG" is the first line in inline-block, "HIJKLMN" is >> the >> last line in inline-block. >> >> What do you think about? >> > > > I agree with your InlineBlockAlphabeticalAlignment.PNG (under current > spec) but... > > 'writing-mode: sideways-left' > > has a good chance of being adopted by CSSWG ... and then > 'text-orientation: sideways-left' would be dropped according to > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0060.html > > > Gérard > -- > Test Format Guidelines > http://testthewebforward.org/docs/test-format-guidelines.html > > Test Style Guidelines > http://testthewebforward.org/docs/test-style-guidelines.html > > Test Templates > http://testthewebforward.org/docs/test-templates.html > > CSS Naming Guidelines > http://testthewebforward.org/docs/css-naming.html > > Test Review Checklist > http://testthewebforward.org/docs/review-checklist.html > > CSS Metadata > http://testthewebforward.org/docs/css-metadata.html > -- # 塩澤 元 (Shiozawa, Hajime) # mail: hajime.shiozawa@gmail.com
Received on Saturday, 18 July 2015 15:32:14 UTC