- From: Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
- Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 16:12:47 -0500
- To: 塩澤 元 (Shiozawa, Hajime) <hajime.shiozawa@gmail.com>
- Cc: Public CSS Test suite mailing list <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
Le 2015-02-17 09:17, 塩澤 元 a écrit : > Gérard, > > 2015-02-17 13:52 GMT+09:00 Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>: > >> Hajime, >> >> I examined >> >> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css-writing-modes-3_dev/ >> nightly-unstable/html/vertical-alignment-011-sidewaysright.htm >> >> and >> >> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css-writing-modes-3_dev/ >> nightly-unstable/html/vertical-alignment-012-rl.htm >> >> " >> <percentage> >> Raise (positive value) or lower (negative value) the box by this >> distance (a percentage of the 'line-height' value). The value '0%' >> means >> the same as 'baseline'. >> <length> >> Raise (positive value) or lower (negative value) the box by this >> distance. The value '0cm' means the same as 'baseline'. >> " >> >> So, 'vertical-align: 0em' or 'vertical-align: 0%' should do nothing >> more >> (and nothing less) than 'vertical-align: baseline' regardless of the >> dominant baseline-alignment but it does not in Firefox 38 (I have not >> checked other browsers right now). So, this must be a bug. We need to >> develop a specific test testing just 'vertical-align: 0' versus >> 'vertical-align: baseline' in central baseline-alignment context (say, >> 'text-orientation: mixed'). >> >> Like: >> >> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/ >> vertical-align-baseline-001.htm >> >> and >> >> >> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/vertical-align-baseline-002.htm >> > > OK, I understand. I think you are right. New test filenames ------------------ http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/CSS3WritingModes/s43-vertical-align-0-001.xht http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/CSS3WritingModes/s43-vertical-align-0-002.xht IE11 passes both tests. Bug report: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1133945 > > > I also think your vertical-alignment-011-sidewaysright and >> vertical-alignment-012-rl tests are too long and testing 3 specific >> issues. >> I would split those in 6 smaller tests. >> > > I agree with you. I think that it is better to split into smaller test > because vertical-alignment-*.xht are too long. I think you should do this to other text-orientation tests, especially tests that test 'text-orienation: sideways' and 'text-orientation: sideways-left' . This way, the browsers that will support and implement 'text-orienation: sideways-right', 'text-orienation: upright' and 'text-orienation: mixed' values will eventually be able to claim they pass level 3. All the tests with the tiny 1px blue line and the yellow square image should probably be redone. Originally I thought this was a good idea... but now, I can see it makes those tests not so easy to figure out and to review. Testing text-orientation with baseline alignment should be doable ... but it's a bit more complex than usual... Gérard -- Test Format Guidelines http://testthewebforward.org/docs/test-format-guidelines.html Test Style Guidelines http://testthewebforward.org/docs/test-style-guidelines.html Test Templates http://testthewebforward.org/docs/test-templates.html CSS Naming Guidelines http://testthewebforward.org/docs/css-naming.html Test Review Checklist http://testthewebforward.org/docs/review-checklist.html CSS Metadata http://testthewebforward.org/docs/css-metadata.html
Received on Tuesday, 17 February 2015 21:13:19 UTC