Re: [css-writing-modes-3] vertical-align: 0% in vertical-alignment-011-sidewaysright and vertical-alignment-012-rl

Gérard,

2015-02-17 13:52 GMT+09:00 Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>:

> Hajime,
>
> I examined
>
> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css-writing-modes-3_dev/
> nightly-unstable/html/vertical-alignment-011-sidewaysright.htm
>
> and
>
> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css-writing-modes-3_dev/
> nightly-unstable/html/vertical-alignment-012-rl.htm
>
> "
> <percentage>
>     Raise (positive value) or lower (negative value) the box by this
> distance (a percentage of the 'line-height' value). The value '0%' means
> the same as 'baseline'.
> <length>
>     Raise (positive value) or lower (negative value) the box by this
> distance. The value '0cm' means the same as 'baseline'.
> "
>
> So, 'vertical-align: 0em' or 'vertical-align: 0%' should do nothing more
> (and nothing less) than 'vertical-align: baseline' regardless of the
> dominant baseline-alignment but it does not in Firefox 38 (I have not
> checked other browsers right now). So, this must be a bug. We need to
> develop a specific test testing just 'vertical-align: 0' versus
> 'vertical-align: baseline' in central baseline-alignment context (say,
> 'text-orientation: mixed').
>
> Like:
>
> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/
> vertical-align-baseline-001.htm
>
> and
>
>
> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/vertical-align-baseline-002.htm
>

OK, I understand. I think you are right.


I also think your vertical-alignment-011-sidewaysright and
> vertical-alignment-012-rl tests are too long and testing 3 specific issues.
> I would split those in 6 smaller tests.
>

I agree with you. I think that it is better to split into smaller test
because vertical-alignment-*.xht are too long.

Hajime.


-- 
# 塩澤 元 (Shiozawa, Hajime)
# mail: hajime.shiozawa@gmail.com