- From: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 07:02:21 +0400
- To: "Henri Sivonen" <hsivonen@iki.fi>, "Arron Eicholz" <arronei@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 19:35:39 +0400, Arron Eicholz <arronei@microsoft.com> wrote: > On Wednesday, February 11, 2015 9:03 PM Simon Pieters > [mailto:simonp@opera.com] >> On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 00:00:46 +0400, Arron Eicholz >> <arronei@microsoft.com> >> wrote: >> >> >> Does your request to move/revert stand with that in mind? Or do you >> >> disagree with 2.1 errata for this? >> > >> > I was not part of the discussion in Sydney but if the CSS 2.1 errata >> > matches what is in CSS-Syntax then I am fine with it. >> >> Excellent. Then just wait until the errata is written. >> > > That maybe fine and all but didn't we put the cart before the horse here > in checking in test cases before they can be verified correct per the > spec from the help link provided in the test case? I guess, but I didn't expect drama to ensue because of it. > At this point I have to reject the test cases because there is no > backing evidence (spec evidence) to support the test case based on the > link provided. > > If there has been a resolution in the working group at the Sydney > meeting please point me to that and I will use that for possibly > approving the test cases. http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/css/20150209#l-149 https://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Tracker/actions/665 -- Simon Pieters Opera Software
Received on Friday, 13 February 2015 06:02:54 UTC