- From: Arron Eicholz <arronei@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 15:30:50 +0000
- To: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- CC: "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
On Thursday, February 12, 2015 7:02 PM Simon Pieters [mailto:simonp@opera.com] wrote: > On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 19:35:39 +0400, Arron Eicholz <arronei@microsoft.com> > wrote: > > > On Wednesday, February 11, 2015 9:03 PM Simon Pieters > >> >> Does your request to move/revert stand with that in mind? Or do > >> >> you disagree with 2.1 errata for this? > >> > > >> > I was not part of the discussion in Sydney but if the CSS 2.1 > >> > errata matches what is in CSS-Syntax then I am fine with it. > >> > >> Excellent. Then just wait until the errata is written. > >> > > > > That maybe fine and all but didn't we put the cart before the horse > > here in checking in test cases before they can be verified correct per > > the spec from the help link provided in the test case? > > I guess, but I didn't expect drama to ensue because of it. No problem. If you could, and I will keep my eyes open for it too, remind me to review these tests when the updates are put into errata. It should be a breeze to review them at that time. > > > At this point I have to reject the test cases because there is no > > backing evidence (spec evidence) to support the test case based on the > > link provided. > > > > If there has been a resolution in the working group at the Sydney > > meeting please point me to that and I will use that for possibly > > approving the test cases. > > http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/css/20150209#l-149 > https://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Tracker/actions/665 > Thanks for the meeting notes. This helps see the need for the tests. -- Thanks, Arron Eicholz
Received on Friday, 13 February 2015 15:31:18 UTC