- From: Arron Eicholz <arronei@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 15:35:39 +0000
- To: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- CC: "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
On Wednesday, February 11, 2015 9:03 PM Simon Pieters [mailto:simonp@opera.com] > On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 00:00:46 +0400, Arron Eicholz <arronei@microsoft.com> > wrote: > > >> Does your request to move/revert stand with that in mind? Or do you > >> disagree with 2.1 errata for this? > > > > I was not part of the discussion in Sydney but if the CSS 2.1 errata > > matches what is in CSS-Syntax then I am fine with it. > > Excellent. Then just wait until the errata is written. > That maybe fine and all but didn't we put the cart before the horse here in checking in test cases before they can be verified correct per the spec from the help link provided in the test case? At this point I have to reject the test cases because there is no backing evidence (spec evidence) to support the test case based on the link provided. If there has been a resolution in the working group at the Sydney meeting please point me to that and I will use that for possibly approving the test cases. -- Thanks, Arron Eicholz
Received on Thursday, 12 February 2015 15:36:10 UTC