- From: Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
- Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 19:27:26 -0500
- To: Peter Linss <peter.linss@hp.com>
- Cc: Public CSS Test suite mailing list <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
Peter, This is just to be sure here... A few min. ago, I hg-add-ed and hg-push-ed these 3 tests http://test.csswg.org/source/css-writing-modes-3/wm-block-progression-001.xht http://test.csswg.org/source/css-writing-modes-3/wm-block-progression-003.xht http://test.csswg.org/source/css-writing-modes-3/wm-block-progression-004.xht and they each are linked to a reference file inside css-multicol-1 spec folder: http://test.csswg.org/source/css-multicol-1/multicol-count-002-ref.xht Now, I swear I understood from you that this is okay, that this sort of deep linking across spec folders is okay. All I am requesting here is a confirmation that doing this is okay .... as I intend to reuse many times such multicol-count-002-ref.xht in css-writing-modes-3 tests. --------- Another option would be to move this multicol-count-002-ref.xht into http://test.csswg.org/source/css21/reference/ and then filename-rename it ref-multicol-count-002.xht and make proper linkage edition in "associated with" tests. I'm open to your feedback here. Gérard -- Test Format Guidelines http://testthewebforward.org/docs/test-format-guidelines.html Test Style Guidelines http://testthewebforward.org/docs/test-style-guidelines.html Test Templates http://testthewebforward.org/docs/test-templates.html CSS Naming Guidelines http://testthewebforward.org/docs/css-naming.html Test Review Checklist http://testthewebforward.org/docs/review-checklist.html CSS Metadata http://testthewebforward.org/docs/css-metadata.html
Received on Thursday, 27 November 2014 00:28:02 UTC