- From: Leif Arne Storset <lstorset@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 15:55:17 +0200
- To: public-css-testsuite@w3.org
On Mon, 17 Sep 2012 10:14:25 +0200, Leif Arne Storset <lstorset@opera.com> wrote: > On Thu, 13 Sep 2012 00:33:43 +0200, fantasai > <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > >> Reftest harnesses often work by taking screenshots and comparing those >> screenshots. Parts of a test outside the viewport are therefore not >> compared. The question here is, what is the smallest size that we need >> to accommodate? >> >> Mozilla is suggesting 600x600; does anyone think we need to go smaller? > > I was asked to confirm this, so here goes: > > Opera does not need to go smaller. (We run our tests in 1600x1200 by > default.) This still applies, but I'd like to add a suggestion for the future. In our system, individual tests can override this default size. For instance, a number of tests for meta viewport use 320x240px. So a single size does not fit all tests. Opera would suggest adding meta information for test size where necessary. If anyone ends up creating and publishing tests which depend on a particular screen size, we would all appreciate an automatic way of applying that information to our test runners. -- Leif Arne Storset Layout Developer, Opera Software Oslo, Norway
Received on Wednesday, 26 September 2012 13:55:51 UTC