- From: Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
- Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 19:05:53 -0400
- To: "fantasai" <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>, "Ryosuke Niwa" <rniwa@google.com>, "Lachlan Hunt" <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>, "w3c-css-wg" <w3c-css-wg@w3.org>
Le Mer 12 septembre 2012 18:33, fantasai a écrit : > Reftest harnesses often work by taking screenshots and comparing those > screenshots. Parts of a test outside the viewport are therefore not > compared. The question here is, what is the smallest size that we need > to accommodate? > > Mozilla is suggesting 600x600; does anyone think we need to go smaller? > > ~fantasai For your information, some tests - which do not have a reftest - are in the NeedsWork status because, precisely, they are not reliable, not trustworthy at 640px. Eg. http://test.csswg.org/shepherd/testcase/margin-collapse-154/ http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/margin-collapse-154.htm http://test.csswg.org/shepherd/testcase/position-004/ http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/position-004.htm By choosing 600x600, we may eventually find a few more tests that are incorrect at smaller than 640px width. Gérard -- Contributions to the CSS 2.1 test suite: http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/ CSS 2.1 Test suite RC6, March 23rd 2011: http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/toc.html CSS 2.1 test suite harness: http://test.csswg.org/harness/ Contributing to to CSS 2.1 test suite: http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/web-authors-contributions-css21-testsuite.html
Received on Wednesday, 12 September 2012 23:06:22 UTC