- From: Rebecca Hauck <rhauck@adobe.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 12:02:57 -0700
- To: Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>, "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 12 September 2012 19:02:40 UTC
Hi Gérard, I've updated the first batch of borders tests to include CSS3 spec links and convert wherever possible. Since you've been doing a lot of conversions, I wanted to have you spot-check this first batch to make sure the changes I've made are ok. Most/all of the tests in this suite are testing the border shorthand property – not specific property values, just various permutations & syntax. I took the liberty of changing dashed borders to double in order to easily create references. Can you confirm that's ok? The rest of the changes I made were smaller – increased width of the border, change "blue" to "green" in some cases. Also, the wording of the assert I changed from "two boxes" to "two concentric squares" (for example). The latter is less ambiguous. The tests where I only added spec links I pushed back to the approved directory: border 001, 003, 005, 006, 008. (maybe these can be flipped back to Approved now?) The ones I converted and changed are forked and pushed to my submitted folder: rhauck/submitted/css3-backgroundsborders: border 002, 004, 007, 009-018. Also, one last question: can you clarify the proper tagging I should be doing in the subject line for other mails of the nature? Should I be adding [RC6] to them as you do? Thanks! -Rebecca
Received on Wednesday, 12 September 2012 19:02:40 UTC