- From: Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
- Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 23:51:08 -0400
- To: "Zhang, Zhiqiang" <zhiqiang.zhang@intel.com>
- Cc: "Public CSS testsuite mailing list@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>, "Christensen, Kenneth" <kenneth.christensen@intel.com>, "Zhang, Haili" <haili.zhang@intel.com>, "Yu, Ling L" <ling.l.yu@intel.com>, "Yang, Lei A" <lei.a.yang@intel.com>
Le Lun 15 octobre 2012 22:12, Zhang, Zhiqiang a écrit : >> -----Original Message----- >> From: "Gérard Talbot" [mailto:css21testsuite@gtalbot.org] >> Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 10:03 AM >> To: Zhang, Zhiqiang >> Cc: Public CSS testsuite mailing list@w3.org; Christensen, Kenneth; >> Zhang, >> Haili; Yu, Ling L; Yang, Lei A >> Subject: RE: background-size-003 (Re: New tests submission for css3 >> background-clip/-origin/-size) >> >> >> Le Lun 15 octobre 2012 7:32, Zhang, Zhiqiang a écrit : >> >> >> >> http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/intel/submitted/css3- >> >> background/background-size-003.html >> >> >> >> I think >> >> >> >> line 26: height: 90px; >> >> >> >> should be instead >> >> >> >> line 26: height: 100px; >> >> >> >> Also, >> >> >> >> line 19: width: 58px; >> >> line 20: height: 58px; >> >> >> >> should be preferably replaced with >> >> >> >> line 19: width: 148px; >> >> line 20: height: 148px; >> >> >> > >> > If make these changes, the test loses its original purpose for >> checking >> > 'background-size' value 'cover' comparing to 'contain' in >> > background-size-004. I just designed background-size-003 and -004 >> with >> > height 90px and width 100px to check 'background-size' values >> 'cover' >> > and 'contain' respectively. >> >> Okay. I see. >> >> > However, the test still needs to update its >> > reference height and width as >> https://hg.csswg.org/test/rev/397604280e79 >> >> >> One problem with the current background-size-003 test is that testers >> may interpret "inside black dotted borders" as applying to the 4 >> borders >> - that would include the border-bottom - and then consider what they >> see as a failure. > > Yes, I am still thinking how to simplify this to make it easier to check > "cover" and "contain". > >> >> I am working on a possible replacement... > > Thank you very much. I really appreciate your effort and help. Zhiqiang, Filenames of these webpages should be renamed. To something like: background-size-cover-001 background-size-cover-002 background-size-contain-001 background-size-contain-002 http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/review/background-size-003-review.html http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/review/background-size-003b-review.html http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/review/background-size-004-review.html http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/review/background-size-004b-review.html IE7 and IE8 fail all 4 tests. Konqueror 4.9.2 fails background-size-003-review and background-size-003b-review; it also seems to fail 004 and 004b. I created the support 50x50-green.png image; so eventually it will have to be hg-added and hg-pushed into the proper support/ folder. Gérard -- Contributions to the CSS 2.1 test suite: http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/ CSS 2.1 Test suite RC6, March 23rd 2011: http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/toc.html CSS 2.1 test suite harness: http://test.csswg.org/harness/ Contributing to to CSS 2.1 test suite: http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/web-authors-contributions-css21-testsuite.html
Received on Tuesday, 16 October 2012 03:51:37 UTC