- From: Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
- Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 22:02:38 -0400
- To: "Zhang, Zhiqiang" <zhiqiang.zhang@intel.com>
- Cc: "Public CSS testsuite mailing list@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>, "Christensen, Kenneth" <kenneth.christensen@intel.com>, "Zhang, Haili" <haili.zhang@intel.com>, "Yu, Ling L" <ling.l.yu@intel.com>, "Yang, Lei A" <lei.a.yang@intel.com>
Le Lun 15 octobre 2012 7:32, Zhang, Zhiqiang a écrit : >> >> http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/intel/submitted/css3- >> background/background-size-003.html >> >> I think >> >> line 26: height: 90px; >> >> should be instead >> >> line 26: height: 100px; >> >> Also, >> >> line 19: width: 58px; >> line 20: height: 58px; >> >> should be preferably replaced with >> >> line 19: width: 148px; >> line 20: height: 148px; >> > > If make these changes, the test loses its original purpose for checking > 'background-size' value 'cover' comparing to 'contain' in > background-size-004. I just designed background-size-003 and -004 with > height 90px and width 100px to check 'background-size' values 'cover' > and 'contain' respectively. Okay. I see. > However, the test still needs to update its > reference height and width as https://hg.csswg.org/test/rev/397604280e79 One problem with the current background-size-003 test is that testers may interpret "inside black dotted borders" as applying to the 4 borders - that would include the border-bottom - and then consider what they see as a failure. I am working on a possible replacement... Gérard -- Contributions to the CSS 2.1 test suite: http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/ CSS 2.1 Test suite RC6, March 23rd 2011: http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/toc.html CSS 2.1 test suite harness: http://test.csswg.org/harness/ Contributing to to CSS 2.1 test suite: http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/web-authors-contributions-css21-testsuite.html
Received on Tuesday, 16 October 2012 02:03:08 UTC