RE: background-size-032 (Re: New tests submission for css3 background-clip/-origin/-size)

> >
> > http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/intel/submitted/css3-
> background/background-size-032.html
> >
> > This test should be using a dramatically bigger font-size (say, font:
> > 5em/1 == 80px/1) and most probably the Ahem font should be used so
> that
> > content area would be fully under control in the test.
> >
> > One issue is that background-image are painted behind glyphs, so here
> > Ahem font would need to be transparent (with color: transparent),
> > otherwise ::first-letter would need to declare absolute or relative
> > positioning.

I don't think it has to use Ahem font in this test because it doesn't need to fully control the content area. Sure, if we want to write a reftest for this test, it's better to use the Ahem font.

> >
> > Since the test is about ::first-letter, then a single word should be
> > used; a full paragraph of 2 sentences is not needed.
> 
> 
> 
> It should be
> 
> line 13: div::first-letter
> 
> and not
> 
> line 13: div:first-letter

Updated.  

But www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/selector.html#first-letter has examples using :first-letter.

E.g.
p:first-letter { font-size: 3em; font-weight: normal }

And I think that :first-letter and ::first-letter are same thing, right?

> 
> --------
> 
> "
> Since green-with-no-red is often used to indicate success, it's best to
> also avoid green unless using the presence of red to indicate failures.
> "
> http://wiki.csswg.org/test/format#design-requirements
> 
> So the color usage in background-size-032 is not best.
> 

Updated the background-image to blue96x96.png @ https://hg.csswg.org/test/rev/06faac60a4a7

Received on Monday, 15 October 2012 13:32:37 UTC