- From: Aryeh Gregor <ayg@aryeh.name>
- Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 10:41:57 -0500
- To: Øyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com>
- Cc: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, public-css-testsuite@w3.org
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 5:35 AM, Øyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com> wrote: > I should probably mention that I volunteered as owner of the Animations > testsuite a while back (since nobody else spoke up) [1], and that since > then, I have created about 150 tests (not submitted quite yet). Those are > all automated via testharness.js (some using setTimeout, some using the > animation events, some neither), and can also be visually/manually inspected > for a more thorough check (they don't have reference animations, though). > > There seems to be no owner for Transitions yet, by the way [2]. Are the tests somewhere public? We wouldn't want to duplicate effort. You can put them in an incoming/ directory if you don't want to officially submit them yet. > Opera doesn't support requestAnimationFrame currently. I suppose this makes > me biased as well, but I think it would be unfortunate if the W3C testsuites > were to depend on proprietary features (as far as I know, current > implementations are all prefixed and the spec is at FPWD). It's not proprietary -- there's a spec, and it's in WD just like transitions/animations themselves. Of course, if tests would use requestAnimationFrame, UAs that don't support it wouldn't be deemed to not support transitions/animations properly because of it. Those tests would apply only to UAs that supported both transitions/animations and requestAnimationFrame. On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 5:59 AM, Øyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com> wrote: > (At Opera we can handle regular reftests.) In a fashion that anyone can access, or only for internal Opera use?
Received on Wednesday, 15 February 2012 15:42:52 UTC