- From: Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
- Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 15:07:07 -0500
- To: "Rebecca Hauck" <rhauck@adobe.com>
- Cc: "Arron Eicholz" <arron.eicholz@microsoft.com>, "Public CSS test suite mailing list" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
Le Jeu 13 décembre 2012 14:18, Rebecca Hauck a écrit : > > > On 12/11/12 4:20 PM, "Gérard Talbot" <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org> wrote: > >> >>Le Mar 11 décembre 2012 12:44, Rebecca Hauck a écrit : >>> >>> >>> On 12/7/12 2:29 PM, "Gérard Talbot" <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>>Le Ven 7 décembre 2012 15:55, Rebecca Hauck a écrit : >>>>> >> >>[snipped] >> >>>>As far as I am concerned, we can do 3 (I'm happy with such option) >>>> for >>>>cases with rgb(1%) and rgb(99%) as I said in >>>> >>>>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-css-testsuite/2012Dec/0012.ht >>>>ml >>>> >>>>which is: >>>> >>>>" >>>>3. Update the background-color cases to have 2 references one ref >>>> that >>>>is on either side of the value being defined. >>>>" >>>> >>>>I think we only need to tune the following 8 tests (so that they have >>>> 2 >>>>references on either side) by doing 3.: >>>> >>>>http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/background-co >>>>lo >>>>r-049.htm >>>> >>>>http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/background-co >>>>lo >>>>r-054.htm >>>> >>>>http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/background-co >>>>lo >>>>r-070.htm >>>> >>>>http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/background-co >>>>lo >>>>r-075.htm >>>> >>>>http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/background-co >>>>lo >>>>r-090.htm >>>> >>>>http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/background-co >>>>lo >>>>r-095.htm >>>> >>>>http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/background-co >>>>lo >>>>r-110.htm >>>> >>>>http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/background-co >>>>lo >>>>r-115.htm >>> >>> Ok, great! We'll go with #3 for this set of tests. May I change the >>> status of the others back to Approved or do you prefer to do it? It >>> appears I have permission to that. >> >> >>One issue here. >> >>Changeset: 4777:5211db770fe9 >> >>I changed color-002 to color-063 tests so that they would be comparing >>to an image reference and not to background-color. >> >>When Arron says: >> >>" >>Though this only affects background-color cases really since those are >>the only ones that have the precision problem since they are compared >> to >>the image. Note we should double check all the other cases to confirm >>that they are not compared to other color formats. >>" >> >>I believe he means color-002 to color-063 tests should be reverted to >>what they were, that is comparing to background-color code. > > Yes, I agree given what how we decided to handle the rest of the tests. > Would you like to make the changes in Shepherd or should I? Please, you do it Rebecca! Gérard > > >> >>Gérard >>-- >>Contributions to the CSS 2.1 test suite: >>http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/ >> >>CSS 2.1 Test suite RC6, March 23rd 2011: >>http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/toc.html >> >>CSS 2.1 test suite harness: >>http://test.csswg.org/harness/ >> >>Contributing to to CSS 2.1 test suite: >>http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/web-authors-contr >>ibutions-css21-testsuite.html >> > > -- Contributions to the CSS 2.1 test suite: http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/ CSS 2.1 Test suite RC6, March 23rd 2011: http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/toc.html CSS 2.1 test suite harness: http://test.csswg.org/harness/ Contributing to to CSS 2.1 test suite: http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/web-authors-contributions-css21-testsuite.html
Received on Thursday, 13 December 2012 20:07:37 UTC