- From: Rebecca Hauck <rhauck@adobe.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 11:18:56 -0800
- To: Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
- CC: Arron Eicholz <arron.eicholz@microsoft.com>, Public CSS test suite mailing list <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
On 12/11/12 4:20 PM, "Gérard Talbot" <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org> wrote: > >Le Mar 11 décembre 2012 12:44, Rebecca Hauck a écrit : >> >> >> On 12/7/12 2:29 PM, "Gérard Talbot" <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org> wrote: >> >>> >>>Le Ven 7 décembre 2012 15:55, Rebecca Hauck a écrit : >>>> > >[snipped] > >>>As far as I am concerned, we can do 3 (I'm happy with such option) for >>>cases with rgb(1%) and rgb(99%) as I said in >>> >>>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-css-testsuite/2012Dec/0012.ht >>>ml >>> >>>which is: >>> >>>" >>>3. Update the background-color cases to have 2 references one ref that >>>is on either side of the value being defined. >>>" >>> >>>I think we only need to tune the following 8 tests (so that they have 2 >>>references on either side) by doing 3.: >>> >>>http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/background-co >>>lo >>>r-049.htm >>> >>>http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/background-co >>>lo >>>r-054.htm >>> >>>http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/background-co >>>lo >>>r-070.htm >>> >>>http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/background-co >>>lo >>>r-075.htm >>> >>>http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/background-co >>>lo >>>r-090.htm >>> >>>http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/background-co >>>lo >>>r-095.htm >>> >>>http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/background-co >>>lo >>>r-110.htm >>> >>>http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/background-co >>>lo >>>r-115.htm >> >> Ok, great! We'll go with #3 for this set of tests. May I change the >> status of the others back to Approved or do you prefer to do it? It >> appears I have permission to that. > > >One issue here. > >Changeset: 4777:5211db770fe9 > >I changed color-002 to color-063 tests so that they would be comparing >to an image reference and not to background-color. > >When Arron says: > >" >Though this only affects background-color cases really since those are >the only ones that have the precision problem since they are compared to >the image. Note we should double check all the other cases to confirm >that they are not compared to other color formats. >" > >I believe he means color-002 to color-063 tests should be reverted to >what they were, that is comparing to background-color code. Yes, I agree given what how we decided to handle the rest of the tests. Would you like to make the changes in Shepherd or should I? > >Gérard >-- >Contributions to the CSS 2.1 test suite: >http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/ > >CSS 2.1 Test suite RC6, March 23rd 2011: >http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/toc.html > >CSS 2.1 test suite harness: >http://test.csswg.org/harness/ > >Contributing to to CSS 2.1 test suite: >http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/web-authors-contr >ibutions-css21-testsuite.html >
Received on Thursday, 13 December 2012 19:18:43 UTC