- From: Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
- Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 19:59:55 -0400
- To: "Arron Eicholz" <Arron.Eicholz@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "Public CSS test suite mailing list" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
Arron, [RC6] http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/background-position-019.htm [nightly-unstable] http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/background-position-019.htm [RC6] http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/background-position-020.htm [nightly-unstable] http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/background-position-020.htm [RC6] http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/background-position-031.htm [nightly-unstable] http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/background-position-031.htm [RC6] http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/background-position-032.htm [nightly-unstable] http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/background-position-032.htm [RC6] http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/background-position-043.htm [nightly-unstable] http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/background-position-043.htm [RC6] http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/background-position-044.htm [nightly-unstable] http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/background-position-044.htm [RC6] http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/background-position-055.htm [nightly-unstable] http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/background-position-055.htm [RC6] http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/background-position-056.htm [nightly-unstable] http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/background-position-056.htm [RC6] http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/background-position-067.htm [nightly-unstable] http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/background-position-067.htm [RC6] http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/background-position-068.htm [nightly-unstable] http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/background-position-068.htm [RC6] http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/background-position-103.htm [nightly-unstable] http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/background-position-103.htm [RC6] http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/background-position-104.htm [nightly-unstable] http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/background-position-104.htm and possibly a few others. There are 2 problems with e.g. http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/background-position-067.htm 1st problem ----------- line 18 width: 1.16in; 96px mult by 1.16 == 111.36px Since the width should be 96px plus width of "support/black15x15.png", then it was more precise to use 111px instead of 1.16in 2nd problem ----------- This one is more coriaceous. line 23 background-position: 1in; " If only one value is specified, the second value is assumed to be 'center'. If at least one value is not a keyword, then the first value represents the horizontal position and the second represents the vertical position. (...) center Equivalent to '50%' for the horizontal position if it is not otherwise given, or '50%' for the vertical position if it is. " So, background-position: 1in; is eventually parsed as background-position: 1in 50%; and percentage is rendered according to the following logic: " With a value pair of '14% 84%', the point 14% across and 84% down the image is to be placed at the point 14% across and 84% down the padding box. " So, the vertical middle point of support/black15x15.png image should be positioned at the vertical middle point of the padding box of its element. 15px must be divided by 2 to get such vertical middle point and then position the image at pixel 48 of padding box. So, there we have a fractional pixel issue and it could be at pixel 7 (rounded down) or pixel 8 (rounded up) of the black15x15.png. format issue ------------ There is a format/code issue with all these tests: they all position a background-image inside one single element. There is no need at all for these tests to be using 2 divs. How to correct these tests? Obviously, the image dimensions should have/use even numbers. And then all the tests divs' widths should be recalculated. Since these 12 tests use the same design logic and code, then the same fix could be done to all tests. Proposed replacement (eg. for background-position-019.xht) which fixes all 3 issues -------------------- http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/background-position-019-GT.xht Gérard -- Contributions to the CSS 2.1 test suite: http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/ CSS 2.1 Test suite RC6, March 23rd 2011: http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/toc.html CSS 2.1 test suite harness: http://test.csswg.org/harness/ Contributing to to CSS 2.1 test suite: http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/web-authors-contributions-css21-testsuite.html
Received on Tuesday, 24 April 2012 00:00:29 UTC