- From: Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
- Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2011 11:55:44 -0700
- To: "Arron Eicholz" <arron.eicholz@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "Public CSS test suite mailing list" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
Le Mer 7 septembre 2011 15:12, "Gérard Talbot" a écrit : > Arron, > > [RC6] > http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/background-position-applies-to-004.htm > > [nightly-unstable] > http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/background-position-applies-to-004.htm > > This testcase is supposed to test background-position applied to a > table-row. Now, if the table-row has only 1 single cell, then how can > such testcase be different from testing background-position being > applied to a table-cell? > > My point is that to give a honest, good challenge to browsers, such > testcase should make the table-row have 2 cells at minimum, and ideally > the table should have at least 2 table-rows. > > All this is furthermore justified if other testcases demonstrate > failures in some browsers. The testcase I have in mind here is > > http://the-dees.webs.com/iepp1/55-tr-bg-position.html There are 2 other testcases already on background-position and table-row in 'border-collapse: separate' in the test suite. [RC6] http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/table-backgrounds-bs-row-001.htm [nightly-unstable] http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/table-backgrounds-bs-row-001.htm Also for CSS table: [RC6] http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/table-backgrounds-bs-row-002.htm [nightly-unstable] http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/table-backgrounds-bs-row-002.htm Those 2 table-backgrounds-bs-row-00[1, 2] testcases are failed by IE9 and Chrome 14.0.835.186 but background-position-applies-to-004 is passed by IE9 and Chrome 14.0.835.186. So, in my opinion, this demonstrates that background-position-applies-to-004 is imprecise and give false positives. background-position-applies-to-004 should be removed because it is duplicate or it should be redesigned. Either way, it should not remain in the test suite as it is. Gérard -- Contributions to the CSS 2.1 test suite: http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/ CSS 2.1 Test suite RC6, March 23rd 2011 http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/toc.html CSS 2.1 test suite harness: http://test.csswg.org/harness/
Received on Saturday, 24 September 2011 18:56:17 UTC