- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 23:16:44 -0700
- To: Arron Eicholz <Arron.Eicholz@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
On Wednesday 2011-10-26 00:23 +0000, Arron Eicholz wrote: > http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/z-index-020.htm > Looking at this logic it seems as if the second reference for the > test case is incorrect for the test. Since the outline is painted > in step 7.3 it paints before the inline-block and thus will be > behind the aqua background. Based on attempting to read through Appendix E, I think you're right about what Appendix E says. (That said, either I'm misunderstanding how appendix E works or I found a mistake [1] in it, so I'm not particularly confident tonight.) I'm not sure if the WG really intended to forbid the option of drawing outlines in a step between toplevel step (7) and toplevel step (8), though (a step like toplevel step (10)), particularly given that http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/REC-CSS2-20110607/ui.html#dynamic-outlines says: # This specification does not define how multiple overlapping # outlines are drawn, or how outlines are drawn for boxes that are # partially obscured behind other elements. I think it's a reasonable alternative; it's the current behavior of both Gecko and WebKit. -David [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Oct/0750.html -- 𝄞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 𝄂 𝄢 Mozilla http://www.mozilla.org/ 𝄂
Received on Wednesday, 26 October 2011 06:17:09 UTC