- From: Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
- Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 06:13:27 -0700
- To: "Arron Eicholz" <arron.eicholz@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "Public CSS test suite mailing list" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
Arron, http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/overflow-ancestors-001.htm http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/overflow-ancestors-001.htm The meta assert says: <meta name="assert" content="Overflow clipping does not affect elements which are ancestors to the element being clipped."> but, even though this may be correct, this is not what the testcase is about. An ancestor that has overflow: scroll and a defined/set width will be clipped while its descendant(s) will not be clipped. Actual code ----------- <meta name="assert" content="Overflow clipping does not affect elements which are ancestors to the element being clipped."> <style type="text/css"> #div1 { border: solid; height: 50px; overflow: scroll; width: 100px; } div div { width: 200px; } </style> </head> <body> <p>Test passes if there is an active scrolling mechanism in the box below that can horizontally scroll the "Filler Text".</p> <div id="div1"> <div>Filler Text</div> </div> Proposed correction ------------------- <meta name="assert" content="Overflow clipping which can apply on an ancestor will not apply to its descendants (child, grand-child, children, grand-children, etc)."> <style type="text/css"> div#ancestor { border: solid; height: 50px; overflow: scroll; width: 100px; } div#descendant { width: 200px; } </style> </head> <body> <p>Test passes if there is an active scrolling mechanism in the box below that can horizontally scroll the "Filler Text".</p> <div id="ancestor"> <div id="descendant">Filler Text</div> </div> regards, Gérard -- Contributions to the CSS 2.1 test suite: http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/ CSS 2.1 Test suite RC6, March 23rd 2011 http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/toc.html CSS 2.1 test suite contributors: http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/
Received on Tuesday, 31 May 2011 13:14:00 UTC