Re: CSS2.1 Test Suite Alpha 3 Published

On 06/16/2010 10:56 AM, "Gérard Talbot" wrote:
>
>> CSS2.1 Test Suite Alpha 3 has been published:
>>     http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100615/
>
>
>> Please review the test suite and submit feedback to
>> public-css-testsuite@w3.org. (Follow-ups set.)
>
>
> Fantasai,
>
> 1-
> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100615/html4/overflow-applies-to-001.htm
> to
> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100615/html4/overflow-applies-to-015.htm
>
> Those webpages all use the following doctype declaration
>
> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD//XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
> "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
>
> which should be rather/instead
>
> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
> "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
>
> (notice the extras "//" between DTD and XHTML)

Fixed. Thanks.

> 2-
> a) The Chrome 6.0.427.0 dev application will hang (and CPU activity
> increases dramatically and stays high) when entering chapter pages or
> page with #fragment
>
> b) Other browsers (Konqueror 4.4.4) have repainting problem once you
> clicked a [+] to expand a sub-section (say section 8.3.1). The links to
> testcases have to be hovered in order to be painted. This particular
> issue may not be the responsibility of the testsuite webpage but may
> have to do with the browser itself.
 >
> c) None of the browsers tested so far collapse an expanded section
> marked with a [+] when re-clicking on it. Maybe this was intended.

I just used a simple CSS :target() rule with visibility: collapse,
so, not quite as fancy as a JS solution. :) But I removed it since
it was causing problems. I hope the indexes are okay now.

~fantasai

Received on Monday, 21 June 2010 23:02:48 UTC