- From: Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 10:56:07 -0700
- To: "fantasai" <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
> CSS2.1 Test Suite Alpha 3 has been published: > http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100615/ > Please review the test suite and submit feedback to > public-css-testsuite@w3.org. (Follow-ups set.) Fantasai, 1- http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100615/html4/overflow-applies-to-001.htm to http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100615/html4/overflow-applies-to-015.htm Those webpages all use the following doctype declaration <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD//XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> which should be rather/instead <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> (notice the extras "//" between DTD and XHTML) overflow-applies-to-001.htm to overflow-applies-to-015.htm all have some 30 validation markup errors. W3C validator reports more: http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100615/html4/overflow-applies-to-001.htm " This document uses an inconsistent DOCTYPE declaration. The System Identifier http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd declares the XHTML 1.0 Strict document type, but the associated Public Identifier -//W3C//DTD//XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN does not match this document type. The recommended Public Identifier for http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd is -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN. " The problem is the same with http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/microsoft/submitted/Chapter_11/overflow-applies-to-001.xht to http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/microsoft/submitted/Chapter_11/overflow-applies-to-015.xht Ref.: http://wiki.csswg.org/test/css2.1/format#template-for-new-tests 2- a) The Chrome 6.0.427.0 dev application will hang (and CPU activity increases dramatically and stays high) when entering chapter pages or page with #fragment b) Other browsers (Konqueror 4.4.4) have repainting problem once you clicked a [+] to expand a sub-section (say section 8.3.1). The links to testcases have to be hovered in order to be painted. This particular issue may not be the responsibility of the testsuite webpage but may have to do with the browser itself. e.g.: http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100615/html4/chapter-8.html#s8.3.1 c) None of the browsers tested so far collapse an expanded section marked with a [+] when re-clicking on it. Maybe this was intended. regards, Gérard -- Contributions to the CSS 2.1 test suite: http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/ CSS 2.1 test suite (alpha 3; June 15th 2010): http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100615/html4/toc.html CSS 2.1 test suite contributors: http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/
Received on Wednesday, 16 June 2010 17:56:43 UTC