- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 11:31:20 -0800
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- CC: public-css-testsuite@w3.org
On 10/05/2010 04:36 PM, L. David Baron wrote: > I don't think the text in > http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/visuren.html#propdef-unicode-bidi is > precise enough to imply that unicode-bidi, applied to an img, must > affect that img's alternate text. This is particularly true since > images are replaced elements, and Chapter 3 describes replaced > elements as outside the scope of the CSS formatting model. I've modified the test to set "width: 0" on the images, which should cause any engine that treats alt text as replaced content to make the image content invisible. http://test.csswg.org/source/approved/css2.1/src/bidi-text/bidi-alt-001.xht ~fantasai
Received on Thursday, 9 December 2010 19:32:20 UTC