Re: [RC2] 13 Testcases with a missing (9 ahem, 4 dom) flag

On 10/03/2010 02:49 PM, "Gérard Talbot" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Testcases with ahem flag missing
> --------------------------------
>
> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/units-001.htm
> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/units-002.htm
> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/units-003.htm
> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/units-004.htm
> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/units-006.htm
> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/units-008.htm
> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/units-009.htm
> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/floats-006.htm
> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/floats-009.htm

I believe these have been fixed for RC4.

> Testcases with dom flag missing
> -------------------------------
>
> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/text-transform-bicameral-006.htm
> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/text-transform-bicameral-007.htm
> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/text-transform-bicameral-008.htm
> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/text-transform-bicameral-009.htm

None of these tests actually require DOM support -- it's just there
to help out in case the system font lookup isn't capable of finding
the right fonts to display the test.

~fantasai

Received on Thursday, 9 December 2010 19:32:18 UTC