Re: Proposed improvements to c414-flt-ln-002

On 12/06/2010 10:43 AM, Øyvind Stenhaug wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Dec 2010 09:53:58 +0100, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote:
>
>> On 10/06/2010 04:15 PM, "Gérard Talbot" wrote:
>>> Øyvind and Geoffrey,
>>>
>>> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/c414-flt-ln-002.htm
>>>
>>> We discussed the c414-flt-ln-002 test before.
>>
>> I've altered the test to make it easier to determine the pass/fail conditions:
>> http://test.csswg.org/source/approved/css2.1/src/css1/c414-flt-ln-002.xht
>>
>> Let me know if this addresses the problem.
>
> To me it definitely looks easier to interpret now. However, there are some issues.
>
> - Most importantly, it seems to break at some widths (e.g. about 840px on Ubuntu and 960px on WinXP for me, Opera and
> Firefox). Seems like it doesn't consider the case where the blue area is already occupied by the BBBB float. (E.g. box C
> within 9.4em of .gutter's/BBBB's left edge, but would wrap to the next line if CCCC were moved up from the line below C)

Added more conditions to the pass condition...

> - The vertical alignment is still off by 1-2 px, in all desktop browsers I've tried. The height of the content area of inline
> non-replaced elements seems to be undefined in the spec.

I don't think I can do anything about that, unfortunately.

> - The blue region is on the right, not on the left

Uh, right. :) Fixed.

~fantasai

Received on Tuesday, 7 December 2010 02:53:55 UTC