- From: Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
- Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 11:13:50 -0800
- To: "Arron Eicholz" <Arron.Eicholz@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
Le Ven 3 décembre 2010 9:47, Arron Eicholz a écrit :
> On Wednesday, October 27, 2010 1:45 PM Gérard Talbot wrote:
>> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/table-height-algorithm-
>> 027.htm
>> (RC2)
>>
>> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101027/html4/table-height-algorithm-
>> 027.htm
>> (RC3)
>>
>> IMO, the font-size is rarely a problem or should not be considered a
>> problem
>> in almost any testcase of the test suite.
>>
>> Anything below 16px as font-size is not best, not desirable.
>>
>> In that table-height-algorithm-027.htm testcase, I think it was much
>> better to
>> increase td width instead of reducing font-size.
>>
>
> Fixed
http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/microsoft/submitted/Chapter_17/table-height-algorithm-027.htm
http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/microsoft/submitted/Chapter_17/table-height-algorithm-027.xht
The testcase is now different. I think at line 14
font: 20px Ahem;
should be replaced with
font: 20px/1 Ahem;
so that if a tester with Firefox 3.6+ scrolls up, the bottom
half-leading from top <span> won't be visible, noticeable.
Under gecko-based browsers, line-height: normal computes to 1.2, not 1.
regards, Gérard
--
Contributions to the CSS 2.1 test suite:
http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/
CSS 2.1 test suite (RC3; October 27th 2010):
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101027/html4/toc.html
CSS 2.1 test suite contributors:
http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/
Received on Saturday, 4 December 2010 19:14:26 UTC