Arron Eicholz wrote: > Cases determined correct: > > http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100701/html4/font-family-name-022.htm > http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100701/html4/font-family-name-023.htm These two were not correct given the change in font family name quoting rules. See CSS 2.1 issue 114 for more details. http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-114 I've checked in updated versions that conform to the new rules. > http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100701/html4/font-weight-bolder-001.htm > http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100701/html4/font-weight-lighter-001.htm > http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100701/html4/font-weight-normal-001.htm As noted previously, these are optional tests for browsers that support more than simple regular/bold/italic/bold italic font families (translation: browsers using Windows GDI). We should probably pull them out of the general test list (if the build system allows that) and append a note somewhere about these. John DaggettReceived on Thursday, 5 August 2010 08:31:16 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 20 January 2023 19:58:15 UTC