- From: Ray Kiddy <ray@ganymede.org>
- Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 09:00:16 -0800
- To: public-css-testsuite@w3.org
On Jan 9, 2008, at 8:42 AM, fantasai wrote: > > Stewart Brodie wrote: >> Re: CSS2.1-test-suite/raw-tests/css1tests/css1test543.xml >> (t1504-c543-txt-decor-00-d-g.htm in the built HTML 4.01 version) >> Currently, the CSS2.1 text-decoration test case does not test all the >> various constraints that affect whether or not the decorations apply, >> specifically where floating and absolutely positioned elements are >> involved. >> I would like to see such test cases incorporated. >> What is the best way to do this? Is it better to submit a >> completely new >> test or to suggest changes to an existing test and classify it as >> a "fix" >> for the existing test? I can post a small diff against the CVS >> file that >> adds these test cases. > > In this case, because > a) the test is already fairly long > and > b) it's derived from the CSS1 test suite > I'd suggest writing a new test. > >> Would doing the latter mean I could avoid having to fill out any >> permission >> granting forms (which could incur a long, local, admin overhead?) > > There's very little overhead for the permission granting form. You > can fill > it out here: http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/1/testgrants2-200409/ > Is this URL going to be valid for a long time. I would like to keep it for future use, but it does not look like a very "persistent" URL. Doing a search on the W3C does not obviously find this page and the page does seem to be very "tied in" to the site in a way that would make it easy to find later. Is there a way that this page could be placed on the site in a more obvious and findable location? thanx - ray > The template for new tests is here: > http://csswg.inkedblade.net/test/css2.1/format > > ~fantasai > >
Received on Wednesday, 9 January 2008 17:00:37 UTC