- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 12:02:05 +0100
- To: "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com>, "Bert Bos" <bert@w3.org>, "Lachlan Hunt" <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
- Cc: public-css-testsuite@w3.org
On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 11:55:53 +0100, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com> wrote: > I would like to see that clarified that in the draft then. (I made the > test.) The syntax seems ambigious at best: > <http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-mediaqueries/#syntax> > > It seems to define 'max-width' as a media feature quite clearly. In addition, how many implementors treat 'max-width' as not a feature and 'width' as a feature? Internal builds of Opera treat both as a feature. (Per syntax.) I'm also unsure if we treat 'width' as 'min-width:0' or just as "feature checking". I assume the latter, but it's hard to test :-) -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Monday, 21 November 2005 11:02:18 UTC