Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-shared-element-transitions-1] Renaming and brevity (#7788)

If I may summarize, there didn't seem to be an objection to generally having `view-transition-` prefix for the pseudo elements, but admittedly we didn't focus the discussion on this.

Most of the discussion centered around `view-transition-images` in [this proposal](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7788#issuecomment-1266772511)

* There was some pushback on using the word "image" or "images" in here, since the element is not an image but a container. The counter proposal was `view-transition-set`
* The concern about "set" was that it's too generic

Some other proposals I saw in no particular order were:
* `view-transition-images`
* `view-transition-set`
* `view-transition-image-set`
* `view-transition-effect-group`

and some other combinations of those words.

In this domain, we don't expect this element to be frequently targeted, so I think a longer name is acceptable.

Personally, I'm fine with one of the four combinations: `view-transition-{image,effect}-{group,set}`, which seems to be most of the proposals anyway :)

Do folks have other front runners that they would like to consider? Or is there a combination of those that is particularly objectionable? I'm hoping we can reduce the set to a handful of candidates and take a vote if there is no consensus otherwise.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by vmpstr
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7788#issuecomment-1270309048 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Thursday, 6 October 2022 15:50:59 UTC