- From: Khushal Sagar via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2022 20:53:21 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Reading the notes from the discussion, I think `view-transition-effect-group` would address concerns with the other options. It's not using the word image which creates confusion about the elements underneath being replaced elements but not `img`. And avoids the too generic concern with just view-transition-group. It's longer but between brevity and clarity, we should err on the side of brevity. @fantasai @astearns @tabatkins, any objection to `view-transition-effect-group`? -- GitHub Notification of comment by khushalsagar Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7788#issuecomment-1275264563 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 11 October 2022 20:53:23 UTC