- From: fantasai via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2022 03:27:10 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Just throwing out some ideas... Using "swap" instead of "transition" as @astearns suggested and adding an image-pair wrapper to support nesting going forward... ``` ::swap ::swap-view(header) ::swap-view-group(header) ::swap-view-old(header) ::swap-view-new(header) ``` or maybe ``` ::view-swap ::view-swap-set(header) ::view-swap-pair(header) ::view-swap-old(header) ::view-swap-new(header) ``` (I don't quite like the confusion over whether sets or pairs are outermost.) I think View Transitions is a very natural name for this feature, though, and keeping it in the pseudo names is long but also helpful? -- GitHub Notification of comment by fantasai Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7788#issuecomment-1266347088 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 4 October 2022 03:27:11 UTC