- From: fantasai via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2022 17:52:34 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
@jakearchibald That looks pretty self-consistent! A couple minor things I'd modify: - We cold drop -root, and just have `::view-transition` without parens be the root - I think I like `::view-transition-set` better than `::view-transition-images` So ``` view-transition-name: ::view-transition ::view-transition(name) ::view-transition-set(name) ::view-transition-old(name) ::view-transition-new(name) document.createViewTransition(); ``` How well does this structure work with your nesting proposal? -- GitHub Notification of comment by fantasai Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7788#issuecomment-1268750660 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 5 October 2022 17:52:35 UTC