- From: fantasai via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2018 22:22:46 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I don't think it indicates use cases either way, it indicates that people are unintentionally relying on it *not having an effect* in certain shrinkwrap cases (and being upset that it doesn't in others). Which is a case for being more specific about where it's applied. Note that it should affect the min-content size, but not the max-content size; I can't see any reason for the testcase in https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1476180 failing. If tables are a particular problem, adding `table { overflow-wrap: normal; }` to the UA stylesheet could be considered. Then the author can adjust their approach if necessary. (Given that data frequently gets stacked side-by-side and is especially likely to get unexpectedly squashed, this is a pretty reasonable style rule to add.) -- GitHub Notification of comment by fantasai Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2951#issuecomment-408253328 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 26 July 2018 22:22:51 UTC