W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > July 2018

Re: [csswg-drafts] [selectors4] Name the “functional pseudo-class like :matches() with 0 specificity”

From: Brian Kardell via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 22:26:05 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-405748271-1531866364-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
 I've been hesitant to comment because I've not had anything particularly thoughtful to add beyond varying degrees of conflicting thoughts on each one.  However, over the past week or so I have informally talked to a (small) number of people with various degrees of skill who either independently arrived at `:zero(...)` or `:nil(...)` when posed the description without options, or, having known options agreed that this is among the better ones in this thread.

I just want to note that is isn't in the table above and I am in that camp, I think that either of those makes more sense to me than many of the others and I think the big strike against it in terms of the table is that it would prevent from later extending it to be arbitrary specificity.  I'm not entirely convinced that is actually a big strike though.

GitHub Notification of comment by bkardell
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2143#issuecomment-405748271 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 17 July 2018 22:26:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 17 July 2018 22:26:13 UTC