- From: Domenic Denicola via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 15:45:19 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Concretely, and with regard to the feedback in https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2411#issuecomment-377768803, I think this means:
- Say "content attribute" in most (all?) places you current say "attribute". You can omit it if it's quite obvious, e.g. I think "the [part] attribute" is fine as long as [part] links to the `<dfn>` which will say "The **part** content attribute".
- Add the IDL, roughly `partial interface Element { [CEReactions] DOMString part; }` (and partmap).
- Define the IDL attribute [like the ID attribute is defined in DOM](https://dom.spec.whatwg.org/#dom-element-id), including the correct "reflect" link. Unlike DOM, you can use a proper link for the last part of the sentence, instead of just monospace font.
--
GitHub Notification of comment by domenic
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2414#issuecomment-404558016 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 12 July 2018 15:45:39 UTC