- From: DeeDeeG via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 16:16:04 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Thank you for the response. I agree with what you say in your comment. And some of these things (problems with my proposal) stuck out at me as I was writing this up. But I think this goes a long way to laying this concept of the general color font toggle to rest. _(More specifically: this seems conclusive to me regarding a whole-font level of selection mechanism, as opposed to a font-table level of selection, which I am not going to pursue at this time... And which this discussion is also critical of.)_ I think this issue is resolved/can be closed. --- > I don't think you've motivated the reason for this change. I concede the technical case is weak for my suggestion in this issue. For the record, _my motivation_ was this: I personally thought this suggestion might be a good idea for the property (before this discussion), and I was also trying to address some prior comments in other issues that suggested the same thing. I never felt those comments were resolved. Comment by RoelN: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1144#issuecomment-291458684 (and resulting discussion in that issue) This whole issue, basically: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/352 But I do now feel like this issue, #2304 lays out the technical case better for a general (whole-font-selection, not table-selection) color font toggle, and contains a clear discussion as to why that's not a good idea, which I hope can lay that suggestion to rest and/or help build consensus along the way. -- GitHub Notification of comment by DeeDeeG Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2304#issuecomment-369291899 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 28 February 2018 16:16:12 UTC