- From: Mike Bremford via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 19:10:26 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Thank you for your consideration! But no real need. All I wanted to add was that there was another implementation out there, as I'm aware that that can make a difference to the decision process. Yes, ours is (or will be) a PDF renderer, along the lines of Prince or PDF Reactor. We do have a working implementation of this part of the spec as it stands, although (IMHO) the spec could be modified to better serve the purpose it was intended for - some of this was covered in the issue I referenced and I know everyone is aware of those. To sum up: it doesn't bother us in the slightest deferring this until L4, please do. -- GitHub Notification of comment by faceless2 Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2531#issuecomment-380563510 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 11 April 2018 19:10:33 UTC