- From: Brian Birtles via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 23:35:03 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
As a non-US speller, a property name that doesn't include `behavior` would seem preferable. It's also a bit long. Is `scroll-boundary` not sufficient? It also has the advantage of being sufficiently different from the existing (and functionally unrelated) `scroll-behavior`. Or even `scroll-overflow`? -- GitHub Notification of comment by birtles Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/769#issuecomment-337074006 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 16 October 2017 23:35:05 UTC