W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > May 2017

Re: [csswg-drafts] [selectors3] better terminology for ~ sibling combinator?

From: Chris Lilley via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 20:25:03 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-301904695-1494966302-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Yes, that is what "no substantive change" means :)

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by svgeesus
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1382#issuecomment-301904695 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 16 May 2017 20:25:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:41:12 UTC