Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-text] Question re white space processing rules for U+000D

The CSS Working Group just discussed `Question re white space processing rules for U+000D`, and agreed to the following resolutions:

* `RESOLVED: Accept the change in https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/855`

<details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary>
&lt;dael> Topic: Question re white space processing rules for U+000D<br>
&lt;dael> Github topic: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/855<br>
&lt;dael> Rossen: Is dauwhe on?<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: Rossen can we have WD resolution?<br>
&lt;dael> Rossen: Oh, yes.<br>
&lt;fantasai> TabAtkins, would you mind adding the at-risk thing and pushing to /TR?<br>
&lt;dael> Rossen: Is anyone prepared to talk on this?<br>
&lt;dael> TabAtkins: I can do it based on thread.<br>
&lt;dael> TabAtkins: According to the text spec a lone U-000D is the same as a proper line break.<br>
&lt;dael> TabAtkins: Impl don't do that, they dropit frfom white space processing.<br>
&lt;dael> TabAtkins: There's a test case in the issue.  It appears it's consistant. We should prob change spec to match impl.<br>
&lt;dael> Florian: To clarify, is that the one used to be used before OS10?<br>
&lt;dael> TabAtkins: Someone used it at some point.<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: Yes.<br>
&lt;dael> Florian: So it's not likely something on the rise, it's t he other way around.<br>
&lt;dael> ?? Matching imple i s good idea.<br>
&lt;myles> s/??/myles/<br>
&lt;plinss> s/one used/one macs used/<br>
&lt;dael> dbaron: This is about carrage returns getting to the CSS level. Classic mac could have processed before.<br>
&lt;zcorpan> or textContent = "foo\rbar"<br>
&lt;zcorpan> html parser normalizes<br>
&lt;dael> TabAtkins: I don't think HTML parser does magic.<br>
&lt;dael> gsnedders: It repleaces them with [missed]<br>
&lt;dael> TabAtkins: Nevermind. He's just using entitities in text example.<br>
&lt;gsnedders> s/[missed]/line feed (000A)/<br>
&lt;dael> s/text/test<br>
&lt;myles> s/[missed]/line feeds/<br>
&lt;dael> Florian: Then go for it.<br>
&lt;dbaron> s/carrage/carriage/<br>
&lt;dael> Florian: Make the suggested change to match impl.<br>
&lt;dael> Rossen: Okay. Any objections to accepting the change?<br>
&lt;dael> RESOLVED: Accept the change in https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/855<br>
</details>


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/855#issuecomment-300545186 using your GitHub account

Received on Wednesday, 10 May 2017 16:53:50 UTC