> doesn't look to address a case when it says: >> after the last white space character that would fit the line. > > it doesn't define the behavior when there's no white space that would fit the line, correct? Hmmm. I thought the sentence was clear, but having re-read it a couple times, I see what you mean. I've pushed a rewording with a couple of clarifying notes. I think this now defines all cases. Let me know if you think it doesn't. > Also I prefer it be effective only when white space is preserved by the white-space property Since this value only affects what happens in runs of preserved white space, in most cases, it will not do anything if the white-space property is not preserving the white spaces. The difference with what you are suggesting is that as currently specified, it would also call for breaks in overflowing runs of  . I'd rather keep it that way: I'd find it pretty counter intuitive if a value called break-spaces did not do that. If you agree, great. If you don't (and there's no other issue left), can we get this merged, and open a separate issue to discussed this point? -- GitHub Notification of comment by frivoal Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/111#issuecomment-246562561 using your GitHub accountReceived on Tuesday, 13 September 2016 03:23:25 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:41:03 UTC