- From: Greg Mcverry <jgregmcverry@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2018 06:08:16 -0400
- To: Ashley Williams <ashley.williams@pg.canterbury.ac.nz>
- Cc: "public-credibility@w3.org" <public-credibility@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAKCYZhzG2vFZvbVQAMr_Bt1ekQhkcAjqTzXoeoEx2otrxcwfGQ@mail.gmail.com>
Wow awesome. Here is a draft of an unsubmitted lit review I did. It is more k12 students and web credibility rather than technological solutions to peer review https://docs.google.com/document/d/1EQAfjxnPNYWhkK10DfYArptjfXscFrjij5v3D9HmvvQ/edit?usp=drivesdk I will throw it up my blog with a CC license for others to remix. Keep meaning to submit somewhere, someday but will be open peer reviewed publication so being in the wild won't matter. As a tenured professor making the commitment to open access only publishing is easier but I do encourage you to share a "working draft" for community feedback. On Thu, Sep 27, 2018, 3:09 AM Ashley Williams < ashley.williams@pg.canterbury.ac.nz> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm a close-to-completion PhD student undertaking a software engineering > research project that relates to web credibility. My particular focus is on > developing a set of software tools, together with methodology and theory, > for (semi-) automatically identifying credible online content. A particular > application of the tools would be supporting grey literature reviews and > multi-vocal literature reviews e.g. to identify more credible content to be > used by (software) practitioners in their decision-making and by (software > engineering) researchers in their research. I recently signed up to the web > credibility group, and have reviewed the Google Doc. > > I notice in the Google Doc that a proposal was made to conduct a > literature review. I thought you would be interested to know that I have > undertaken a literature review of credibility, and it has been submitted > for peer-reviewed publication. If you are interested in the details I can > share a technical report or similar. The particulars of the review may not > be relevant, but the discussion around the concept of credibility may be of > value and could provide some useful citations etc. > > I’ve some other thoughts relating to the Google Document too, and I can > raise them in due course. > > On a separate matter, I accidentally signed myself up on behalf of my > institution when in fact my registration should have been for an > individual. How could I go about amending that? > > Cheers > > Ashley >
Received on Thursday, 27 September 2018 10:09:52 UTC