Web credibility community

Hi,

I'm a close-to-completion PhD student undertaking a software engineering research project that relates to web credibility. My particular focus is on developing a set of software tools, together with methodology and theory, for (semi-) automatically identifying credible online content. A particular application of the tools would be supporting grey literature reviews and multi-vocal literature reviews e.g. to identify more credible content to be used by (software) practitioners in their decision-making and by (software engineering) researchers in their research. I recently signed up to the web credibility group, and have reviewed the Google Doc.

I notice in the Google Doc that a proposal was made to conduct a literature review. I thought you would be interested to know that I have undertaken a literature review of credibility, and it has been submitted for peer-reviewed publication. If you are interested in the details I can share a technical report or similar. The particulars of the review may not be relevant, but the discussion around the concept of credibility may be of value and could provide some useful citations etc.

I’ve some other thoughts relating to the Google Document too, and I can raise them in due course.

On a separate matter, I accidentally signed myself up on behalf of my institution when in fact my registration should have been for an individual. How could I go about amending that?

Cheers

Ashley

Received on Thursday, 27 September 2018 07:09:33 UTC