- From: Will Abramson <will@legreq.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 13:29:59 +0000
- To: W3C Credentials CG <public-credentials@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 14 March 2025 13:30:15 UTC
Hey, On the DIDWG call yesterday there was a discussion around selective disclosure and elision for DID document. It got me thinking about what a minimal effort approach to supporting elision in DID documents might look like. I put my thoughts together here: https://hackmd.io/@wip-abramson/rk-x9Kln1l TLDR: I think we could just define a new type or types in a DID extension that would enable a form of elision. Interested what folks think, is this worth pursuing or just plain wrong :) Cheers, Will
Received on Friday, 14 March 2025 13:30:15 UTC